APPLE vs FBI

It is a chapter of the conflict between the US authorities and the Apple reserves exceeding $ 180 billion, a senior caused by a court order is needed to allow Apple Loosen blade Phone accused of the bombing of the implementation of the San Bernardino for the information contained therein.
Apple has challenged it, and solidarity with dozens of Internet companies in the battle, which the United Nations entered on the line, warning that American officials have ventured to open "gates of hell" in this case.But there -as seen pesos into a reason other than a court in the matter reveals a struggle between political power and economic interests in the United States, and perhaps in the whole world.

The cause of this dispute is the question of the protection of privacy in correspondence on the Internet in the light of the legal battle between the US Federal Bureau of Investigation and Apple on the phone to decode the suspect in an attack in San Bernardino.

Strategic analyst at the US Republican Party Jack Berkman believes that privacy advocates always say in such cases that there are slides, no end, and end up in a society led by the likes of Stalin and Hitler, and this is not true, the United States wants to combat terrorism.
He believed that Apple is trying to protect itself from any future intervention, used the issue to rally defenders of freedom around the flag.
Berkman did not rule out a decline in the freedom enjoyed by the American society because of what he called radical Islam, which is the American way of life. He said "all Americans understand that, and on Apple to give this information to the FBI."

In contrast, Nathan White, the legal official in the organization "ACCESS NOW" involved, said the defense of the freedom of Internet use, said the US government has no legal justification to force Apple to decode the accused device code, and thus have exceeded the legal powers, arguing that the issue is not just a decoder machine code, but rather to force Apple to use a new model of operational roads completely omits one of the attributes of privacy protection.

White added that the issue is not with one phone, there are about 76 applications unzip other phones blades, and if relented Apple, it should build a new security system, this case will open the door to hackers as well, pointing out that it is not the issue of privacy versus security, and it is a security issue in exchange for security .

He stressed that the Congress is responsible for the adoption of laws that regulate these things, and you should not circumvent it by going to the courts.